![]() The R had a 3,15-inch screen with 2.1m resolution, while the RP has a 3-inch screen with 1.04m points. Even though it is, according to its specification, weaker than the one in the R, it’s hard to see the difference with the naked eye. The rotated LCD touchscreen in the RP is – as always in Canon’s products – great: light and reacts immediately. Lower resolution is visible when you compare the two models, but we can’t say it writes off working with the viewfinder of the RP. The viewfinder is light, contrastive and doesn’t smudge. But the difference is not so visible and the zoom in the EOS RP is just enough. The RP model has also smaller electronic viewfinder (0,39 of an inch vs 0,5 of an inch zoom 0,7 vs zoom 0,76) with a slightly smaller resolution – 2 360 000 points vs 3 000 000 points. But let’s face it: the battery should not be such a disappointment. Of course it is possible to arrange and eventually someone will present the battery grip adjusted to the model. One will need to have one or two spare batteries, as the specification says about 250 photographs achievable with the battery fully charged. Everyone remembers that battery was not the EOS R’s strongest point, so… its weaker version in the EOS RP causes a problem. ![]() Its capacity is twice smaller than the LP-E6N’s (1860 mAh), used in the EOS R. The EOS RP gets the LP-E17 (1000 mAh) type, known from the EOS-M line. What is the biggest – and at the same time the most disturbing – difference? Unfortunately, the battery. The EOS R comes out ahead of the EOS RP in most respects – but at $2299, is it worth the $1000 difference in price? The two cameras actually have a lot of differences under the hood, in everything from autofocus to sensor characteristics. ![]() Canon has just released its full-frame mirrorless EOS RP camera for $1299, and it’s the best moment to take a look at how it looks against the Canon EOS R. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |